[LTP] Test failures obtained on 6.14 kernel in memcontrol04 test
Harshvardhan Jha
harshvardhan.j.jha@oracle.com
Thu Feb 13 14:15:33 CET 2025
On 13/02/25 5:47 PM, Li Wang wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 8:16 PM Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> What kind of failures did you hit?
> Can you try this solution to see if it properly works (with Cgroup
> v2)?
>
>
> I mean this:
> https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2025-January/041653.html
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2025-January/041653.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!MNBFhOrfTUXbdjG8HagfmItqqD1I1N_dn5QjlWv9i-KAeEJHS0Nq67fE1spHEQRD2ia4G0PdnZQX1bMrP8qCPQ$>
>
I'm not able to apply it:
❯ b4 am
https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/CA+B+MYSmAjFQTbt98AZj-CRFSWT-dMc-3dAd5mQ=S6rDEYq+Sw@mail.gmail.com/
Analyzing 5 messages in the thread
Analyzing 0 code-review messages
Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
---
✗ [PATCH v3] memcg/memcontrol04: Fix judgment for recursive_protection
+ Reviewed-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> (✗ DKIM/redhat.com)
+ Acked-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> (✗ DKIM/suse.cz)
---
✗ BADSIG: DKIM/gmail.com
---
Total patches: 1
---
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/CA+B+MYSmAjFQTbt98AZj-CRFSWT-dMc-3dAd5mQ=S6rDEYq+Sw@mail.gmail.com
Base: not specified
git am
./v3_20250115_guojie_jin_memcg_memcontrol04_fix_judgment_for_recursive_protection.mbx
❯ git am -3 *.mbx
Applying: memcg/memcontrol04: Fix judgment for recursive_protection
error: corrupt patch at line 56
error: could not build fake ancestor
Patch failed at 0001 memcg/memcontrol04: Fix judgment for
recursive_protection
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 6:57 PM Harshvardhan Jha via ltp
> <ltp@lists.linux.it> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> I encountered a few variables for memcontrol04 test on 6.14
> kernel.
> These had cgroup v2 enabled. The failures disappear whenever
> cgroup v1
> is instead used.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Harshvardhan
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!MNBFhOrfTUXbdjG8HagfmItqqD1I1N_dn5QjlWv9i-KAeEJHS0Nq67fE1spHEQRD2ia4G0PdnZQX1bMubNlpmA$>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Li Wang
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Li Wang
Thanks & Regards,
Harshvardhan
More information about the ltp
mailing list