[LTP] [RFC PATCH 1/3] Update validate() to support multiple violations
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Thu Feb 20 19:50:26 CET 2025
Hi Mimi,
> Add support for the number of expected violations. Include the
> expected number of violations in the output.
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh
> index 37d8d473c..7f0382fb8 100755
> --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_violations.sh
> @@ -71,20 +71,26 @@ validate()
> local num_violations="$1"
> local count="$2"
> local search="$3"
> + local expected_violations=$4
nit: safer to quote as much as possible (="$4") to avoid errors.
> local max_attempt=3
> local count2 i num_violations_new
> + [ -z $expected_violations ] && expected_violations=1
Also here: -z "$expected_violations"
I can add quotes before merge if you don't want to bother (I would send you a
diff to ack it before merging).
> +
> for i in $(seq 1 $max_attempt); do
> read num_violations_new < $IMA_VIOLATIONS
> count2="$(get_count $search)"
> - if [ $(($num_violations_new - $num_violations)) -gt 0 ]; then
> + if [ $(($num_violations_new - $num_violations)) -eq $expected_violations ]; then
> if [ $count2 -gt $count ]; then
> - tst_res TPASS "$search violation added"
> + tst_res TPASS "$expected_violations $search violation(s) added"
> return
> else
> tst_res TINFO "$search not found in $LOG ($i/$max_attempt attempt)..."
> tst_sleep 1s
> fi
> + elif [ $(($num_violations_new - $num_violations)) -gt 0 ]; then
> + tst_res $IMA_FAIL "$search too many violations added"
nit: maybe print values for debugging?
tst_res $IMA_FAIL "$search too many violations added: $num_violations_new - $num_violations"
FYI failing tests has 2 or 3 higher:
ima_violations 1 TINFO: SUT has required policy content
ima_violations 1 TINFO: using log /var/log/audit/audit.log
ima_violations 1 TINFO: verify open writers violation
ima_violations 1 TFAIL: open_writers too many violations added: 106 - 104
ima_violations 2 TINFO: verify ToMToU violation
ima_violations 2 TFAIL: ToMToU too many violations added: 109 - 107
ima_violations 3 TINFO: verify open_writers using mmapped files
tst_test.c:1900: TINFO: LTP version: 20250130-22-gcd2215702f
tst_test.c:1904: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.13.0-2.g0127a37-default #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jan 23 11:21:55 UTC 2025 (0127a37) x86_64
tst_kconfig.c:88: TINFO: Parsing kernel config '/proc/config.gz'
tst_kconfig.c:676: TINFO: CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION kernel option detected which might slow the execution
tst_test.c:1722: TINFO: Overall timeout per run is 0h 02m 00s
ima_mmap.c:38: TINFO: sleep 3s
ima_violations 3 TFAIL: open_writers too many violations added: 112 - 110
ima_mmap.c:41: TPASS: test completed
Summary:
passed 1
failed 0
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
ima_violations 4 TINFO: verify limiting single open writer violation
ima_violations 4 TFAIL: open_writers too many violations added: 116 - 113
ima_violations 5 TINFO: verify limiting multiple open writers violations
ima_violations 5 TFAIL: open_writers too many violations added: 121 - 117
ima_violations 6 TINFO: verify new open writer causes additional violation
ima_violations 6 TFAIL: open_writers too many violations added: 126 - 122
ima_violations 7 TINFO: verify limiting single open reader ToMToU violations
ima_violations 7 TFAIL: ToMToU too many violations added: 130 - 127
ima_violations 8 TINFO: verify new open reader causes additional ToMToU violation
ima_violations 8 TFAIL: ToMToU too many violations added: 134 - 131
As I noted in previous mail, either has of a backport (can be added later, we
don't have to wait for merging) or skip on older kernels (tst_kvcmp -lt ...).
Kind regards,
Petr
More information about the ltp
mailing list