[LTP] Possible fix for LTP Issue #1219

Minear, Coey coey.minear@hpe.com
Mon Jan 27 19:11:09 CET 2025


I created an issue against LTP: https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/1219. ‘pevik’ suggested that I send a patch here. I’ll admit that I’m uncertain what form would be preferred, but here’s what I’ll share:
[[PATCH]]
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_pagefault01.c b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_pagefault01.c
index 16b3137c0..649bf429a 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_pagefault01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_pagefault01.c
@@ -214,6 +214,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
        .setup = setup,
        .cleanup = tst_kvm_cleanup,
        .needs_root = 1,
+       .needs_drivers = (const char *const []) {
+               "kvm",
+               NULL
+       },
        .supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
                "x86_64",
                NULL
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm01.c b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm01.c
index 32d15526b..f81602567 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm01.c
@@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
        .test_all = tst_kvm_run,
        .setup = tst_kvm_setup,
        .cleanup = tst_kvm_cleanup,
+       .needs_drivers = (const char *const []) {
+               "kvm",
+               NULL
+       },
        .supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
                "x86_64",
                "x86",
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm02.c b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm02.c
index 6914fdcba..701f2731d 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm02.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm02.c
@@ -129,6 +129,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
        .test_all = tst_kvm_run,
        .setup = tst_kvm_setup,
        .cleanup = tst_kvm_cleanup,
+       .needs_drivers = (const char *const []) {
+               "kvm",
+               NULL
+       },
        .supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
                "x86_64",
                "x86",
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm03.c b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm03.c
index 87164d013..87f9887d8 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm03.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm03.c
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ static void *vm_thread(void *arg)

static void setup(void)
{
+       /* Run the common 'tst_kvm_setup()' first. */
+       tst_kvm_setup();
+
        struct sigaction sa = { .sa_handler = sighandler };
        pthread_mutexattr_t attr;

@@ -155,6 +158,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
        .setup = setup,
        .cleanup = cleanup,
        .min_cpus = 2,
+       .needs_drivers = (const char *const []) {
+               "kvm",
+               NULL
+       },
        .supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
                "x86_64",
                "x86",
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm04.c b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm04.c
index e69f0d4be..d8d3bdd96 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm04.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/kvm/kvm_svm04.c
@@ -297,6 +297,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
        .test_all = tst_kvm_run,
        .setup = tst_kvm_setup,
        .cleanup = tst_kvm_cleanup,
+       .needs_drivers = (const char *const []) {
+               "kvm",
+               NULL
+       },
        .supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
                "x86_64",
                "x86",
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/kvm/lib_host.c b/testcases/kernel/kvm/lib_host.c
index 8e3d6094e..17215c23b 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/kvm/lib_host.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/kvm/lib_host.c
@@ -323,7 +323,14 @@ void tst_kvm_clear_guest_signal(struct tst_kvm_instance *inst)

void tst_kvm_setup(void)
{
-
+       /* Do a quick check that the 'kvm' module is actually loaded by
+          checking for '/dev/kvm'. If that device file is not present, then
+          the module is likely not loaded in which case we should just CONF
+          out.
+       */
+       if (access("/dev/kvm", F_OK) != 0) {
+                tst_brk(TCONF, "The test requires 'kvm' device, which is not loaded.");
+       }
}

void tst_kvm_run(void)
[[/PATCH]]

I’ll admit that this possibly contains parts that you may not want, but it includes the parts of the issue that I raised.

Coey Minear



More information about the ltp mailing list