[LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] tst_atomic: drop legacy inline assembly and use __atomic or __sync builtins

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> Or, do you think it's necessary to define a dedicated tst_atomic_t type,
> such as:
> typedef int32_t tst_atomic_t;
> and use it explicitly for all variables that are subject to atomic
> operations?
> 
> This way, we can clearly declare which values are intended for atomic use,
> improving type safety and code clarity.

Sounds good to me.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz