[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls: kill: Remove kill07
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Mon Jun 16 16:18:13 CEST 2025
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 10:09 PM Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@suse.com> wrote:
> On Mon Jun 16, 2025 at 11:08 AM -03, Li Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 7:02 PM Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@suse.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed Jun 11, 2025 at 10:52 PM -03, Li Wang wrote:
> >> > Ricardo B. Marlière via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > From: Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@suse.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> The test case description reads:
> >> >>
> >> >> "Test case to check that SIGKILL can not be caught."
> >> >>
> >> >> It makes use of sigaction() to set up a handler for SIGKILL, but
> >> >> according to its manual page:
> >> >>
> >> >> "EINVAL An invalid signal was specified. This will also be generated
> >> if an
> >> >> attempt is made to change the action for SIGKILL or SIGSTOP, which
> >> cannot
> >> >> be caught or ignored."
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Or could we refactor kill07 to validate the EINVAL when changing
> action
> >> on
> >> > SIGKILL/SIGSTOP?
> >>
> >> But then we would be testing sigaction(). Could you please elaborate?
> >>
> >
> > You're right, if we test sigaction(), then the code should be put into
> > kernel/syscalls/sigaction/sigaction03.c.
> >
> > Maybe we can try:
>
> Sure! But in any case kill07 should still be removed IMHO.
>
Agreed. If you plan to add sigaction03.c separately, this one should be
good.
Reviewed-by: Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>
--
Regards,
Li Wang
More information about the ltp
mailing list