[LTP] interesting breakage in ltp fanotify10
Amir Goldstein
amir73il@gmail.com
Mon Jun 23 09:24:22 CEST 2025
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 11:51 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> LTP 6763a3650734 "syscalls/fanotify10: Add test cases for evictable
> ignore mark" has an interesting effect on boxen where FANOTIFY is not
> enabled. The thing is, tst_brk() ends up calling ->cleanup(). See the
> problem?
> SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(CACHE_PRESSURE_FILE, "%d", old_cache_pressure);
> is executed, even though
> SAFE_FILE_SCANF(CACHE_PRESSURE_FILE, "%d", &old_cache_pressure);
> /* Set high priority for evicting inodes */
> SAFE_FILE_PRINTF(CACHE_PRESSURE_FILE, "500");
> hadn't been.
>
> Result: fanotify10 on such kernel configs ends up zeroing
> /proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure.
oops.
strange enough, I cannot reproduce it as something is preventing
zeroing vfs_cache_pressure:
fanotify23.c:232: TCONF: fanotify not configured in kernel
fanotify23.c:249: TWARN: Failed to close FILE
'/proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure': EINVAL (22)
# cat /proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure
100
But I'll send a fix all the same.
Thanks,
Amir.
More information about the ltp
mailing list