[LTP] [RFC][PATCH 2/2] Use safe_get_nodemap()

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> --- a/testcases/kernel/mem/ksm/ksm06.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/mem/ksm/ksm06.c
> @@ -124,9 +124,7 @@ static void setup(void)
>  
>  	page_size = getpagesize();
>  
> -	nodes = tst_get_nodemap(TST_NUMA_MEM, nr_pages * page_size / 1024);
> -	if (nodes->cnt <= 1)
> -		tst_brk(TCONF, "Test requires at least two NUMA memory nodes");
> +	nodes = safe_get_nodemap(TST_NUMA_MEM, nr_pages * page_size / 1024, 2);
>  }
>  
>  static struct tst_test test = {
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/get_mempolicy01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/get_mempolicy01.c
> index 3c854d1096..031c35f40e 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/get_mempolicy01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/get_mempolicy/get_mempolicy01.c
> @@ -142,9 +142,7 @@ static void setup(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
> -	node = tst_get_nodemap(TST_NUMA_MEM, PAGES_ALLOCATED * getpagesize() / 1024);
> -	if (node->cnt < 1)
> -		tst_brk(TCONF, "test requires at least one NUMA memory node");
> +	node = safe_get_nodemap(TST_NUMA_MEM, PAGES_ALLOCATED * getpagesize() / 1024, 1);

Hmm, we are actually requesting at least 1 node.

The question is if we shouldn't change this. It's very unlikely that we
get wrong answer about on which node memory has been allocated if there
is only one node.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz