[LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/stime: Fix Time Overflow for 2038 Problem on 32-bit Systems
Petr Vorel
pvorel@suse.cz
Wed May 7 15:43:36 CEST 2025
Hi Andrea,
> Hi!
> I noticed that stime01 is equivalent to settimeofday01 when tst_variant=2.
> So I'm wondering if it makes sense to keep that variant, considering that it
> creates issues in 32bit systems. In my opinion, we should probably remove
> the usage of settimeofday inside stime01 and to keep settimeofday01 instead.
> @Petr @Cyril WDYT?
IMHO it's not the same. settimeofday01.c calls settimeofday() libc wrapper,
but stime01.c in tst_variant=2 calls __NR_settimeofday raw syscall.
Kind regards,
Petr
> Kind regards,
> Andrea Cervesato
More information about the ltp
mailing list