[LTP] [PATCH 1/1] readahead02: Sleep 1.5 msec to fix problem on bare metal

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> If readahead doesn't initiate within those first 5ms, this aborts
> immediately, right?
> I'd use higher value for SHORT_SLEEP, say 50ms or more. That's still small
> overhead for the test.

What about doing 50ms sleep first, then use the 5ms in the loop?


-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz