[LTP] [PATCH 1/1] readahead02: Sleep 1.5 msec to fix problem on bare metal

[Jan Stancek]

On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 10:17 AM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Hi!
> > If readahead doesn't initiate within those first 5ms, this aborts
> > immediately, right?
> > I'd use higher value for SHORT_SLEEP, say 50ms or more. That's still small
> > overhead for the test.
>
> What about doing 50ms sleep first, then use the 5ms in the loop?

Fine by me, we can try that and see how things improve.

>
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
>