[LTP] [PATCH] name_to_handle_at: Add test cases for AT_HANDLE_FID
    Petr Vorel 
    pvorel@suse.cz
       
    Mon Oct 20 16:16:43 CEST 2025
    
    
  
Hi Jan,
> Add a few testcases verifying AT_HANDLE_FID flag.
Thanks for keeping tests updated, we really appreciate that.
I wonder if the functionality got merged.
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  include/lapi/fcntl.h                          |  4 +
>  .../name_to_handle_at/name_to_handle_at03.c   | 88 +++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/syscalls/name_to_handle_at/name_to_handle_at03.c
> This is actually a testcase for a kernel regression, the kernel fix is on the
> way.
> diff --git a/include/lapi/fcntl.h b/include/lapi/fcntl.h
> index 7c050248892e..55a5e8b40432 100644
> --- a/include/lapi/fcntl.h
> +++ b/include/lapi/fcntl.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,10 @@
>  # define AT_HANDLE_FID		AT_REMOVEDIR
>  #endif
> +#ifndef AT_HANDLE_CONNECTABLE
> +# define AT_HANDLE_CONNECTABLE	0x002
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifndef AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW
>  # define AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW	0x400
>  #endif
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/name_to_handle_at/name_to_handle_at03.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/name_to_handle_at/name_to_handle_at03.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4a6df5e46fd7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/name_to_handle_at/name_to_handle_at03.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> + */
> +
> +/*\
> + * Basic name_to_handle_at() tests.
> + *
> + * [Algorithm]
nit: unrelated to the test subject. Here needs to be a blank line, otherwise
following lines aren't recognised as list, but they remain inline (RST format
used for spinx).
> + *  - Check that EOVERFLOW is returned as expected by name_to_handle_at().
> + *  - Check that we were able to access a file's stat with name_to_handle_at()
> + *    and open_by_handle_at().
> + */
> +
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include "lapi/name_to_handle_at.h"
> +
> +#define TEST_FILE "test_file"
> +
> +static int fd_atcwd = AT_FDCWD;
> +static struct file_handle *fhp;
> +
> +static struct tcase {
> +	const char *name;
> +	int *dfd;
> +	const char *pathname;
> +	int name_flags;
> +	int exp_errno;
> +} tcases[] = {
> +	{"test-file", &fd_atcwd, TEST_FILE, AT_HANDLE_FID, 0},
> +	{"unexportable-file", &fd_atcwd, "/proc/filesystems", AT_HANDLE_FID, 0},
> +	{"test-file-connectable", &fd_atcwd, TEST_FILE, AT_HANDLE_FID | AT_HANDLE_CONNECTABLE, EINVAL},
> +};
> +
> +static bool handle_type_supported(unsigned int flag, const char *name)
> +{
> +	if (name_to_handle_at(-1, ".", NULL, NULL, flag) && errno == EINVAL) {
> +		tst_brk(TCONF, "%s not supported by the kernel.", name);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +#define REQUIRE_HANDLE_TYPE_SUPPORT(flag) handle_type_supported(flag, #flag)
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> +	SAFE_TOUCH(TEST_FILE, 0600, NULL);
> +	fhp = malloc(MAX_HANDLE_SZ);
> +	if (!fhp)
> +		tst_brk(TBROK, "malloc failed");
> +
> +	REQUIRE_HANDLE_TYPE_SUPPORT(AT_HANDLE_FID);
> +	REQUIRE_HANDLE_TYPE_SUPPORT(AT_HANDLE_CONNECTABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static void run(unsigned int n)
> +{
> +	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
> +	int mount_id;
> +
> +	fhp->handle_bytes = MAX_HANDLE_SZ;
> +	TEST(name_to_handle_at(*tc->dfd, tc->pathname, fhp, &mount_id,
> +			       tc->name_flags));
> +	if (!tc->exp_errno) {
> +		if (TST_RET)
> +			tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "%s: name_to_handle_at() failed", tc->name);
> +		else
> +			tst_res(TPASS, "%s: name_to_handle_at() passed", tc->name);
> +		return;
nit: We have TST_EXP_PASS() ...
> +	}
> +
> +	if (TST_RET != -1)
> +		tst_res(TFAIL, "%s: name_to_handle_at() unexpectedly succeeded", tc->name);
> +	else if (TST_ERR != tc->exp_errno)
> +		tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "%s: name_to_handle_at() should fail with errno %s",
> +			tc->name, tst_strerrno(tc->exp_errno));
> +	else
> +		tst_res(TPASS, "%s: name_to_handle_at() failed as expected", tc->name);
... and TST_EXP_FAIL() to simplify. Something like should work (untested):
if (!tc->exp_errno) {
	TST_EXP_PASS(name_to_handle_at(*tc->dfd, tc->pathname, fhp, &mount_id,
				       tc->name_flags));
	return;
} else {
	TST_EXP_FAIL(name_to_handle_at(*tc->dfd, tc->pathname, fhp, &mount_id,
				       tc->name_flags), tc->exp_errno);
}
Kind regards,
Petr
    
    
More information about the ltp
mailing list