[LTP] [PATCH v3] ioctl_loop01.c: Use proper device for partitioning

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> What's difference between needs_foo and wants_foo? wants_foo means we do
> not do brk if not exist foo?
> I guess we need wants_parted support for .needs_cmds like following
> change? Could you give me more guidance
> 
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ioctl/ioctl_loop01.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,10 @@ static struct tst_test test = {
>                 "loop",
>                 NULL
>         },
> +       .needs_cmds= (const char *const []) {
> +               "wants_parted",
> +               NULL
> +       },

As Peter explained support for this is not in the test library yet.

My proposal was either of:

1. Add .wants_cmd key to the tst_test structure
  - pros: easy to add, easy to handle
  - cons: the number of tst_test structure members will eventually
    double

2. Add a flag to the needs_cmd, i.e. convert needs_cmd into an array of
   structures, we do that for other cases like saving and restoring
   proc/sys files
   - pros: we will keep the number of members of tst_test
           this is easily expandable, e.g. adding support for
	   minimal version
   - cons: all tests that have needs cmds will need to be adjusted

This would look like:

struct tst_cmd {
	const char *cmd;
	unsigned int required:1;
};


After thinking about this I've started to lean towards option 2.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz