[LTP] OpenPOSIX: Add common entry point function for all tests

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Martin,

> Hi!
I overlooked your reply (please my following one with diff).

> On 4/17/26 15:09, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > Hi Martin,

> > > Hi Martin,

> > > On Thu, 16 Apr 2026, Martin Doucha wrote:
> > > > OpenPOSIX: Add common entry point function for all tests

> > > > Add a new shared source file implementing the main() function and rename
> > > > the existing main() functions in test case sources to test_main(). This
> > > > allows adding custom debug code to all test cases at once.

> > > [...]

> > > > diff --git a/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_create/assertions.xml b/...
> > > > -  NOTE: that the thread in which main() was originally invoked is different
> > > > +  NOTE: that the thread in which test_main() was originally invoked is different

> > > This changes verbatim POSIX specification text. The assertions.xml files
> > > quote the POSIX standard, which defines behaviour relative to main() — the C
> > > entry point, not an LTP-internal function name. Revert these hunks in both
> > > pthread_create/assertions.xml and pthread_exit/assertions.xml.

> > +1

> This "issue" is nonsense. I've checked the XML files and the assertions are
> still correct as is regardless of renaming a few functions. The
> pthread_create() and pthread_exit() specification applies special treatment
> to the main thread and adding one more function call between the main()
> function and the test code does not change that.

I understood that spec talks about main() as a specific C startup function.
But ok, I was probably wrong.

> > > > diff --git a/.../aio_write/9-2.c b/.../aio_write/9-2.c
> > > > +int test_main(int argc, char** argv)

> > > s/char** argv/char **argv/ to match the style used everywhere else.

> This typo is actually in conformance/interfaces/strcpy/1-1.c (line 23793 of
> the patch). Please change the test_main() signature to this during merge:
> int test_main(int argc PTS_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, char **argv
> PTS_ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)

OK, fixed and merged. Thanks!

> I don't think it makes sense to send another 1MB patch to fix one line.

That's why I sent another reply with diff.

Kind regards,
Petr