[LTP] [PATCH] Added new_behavior flag to detect kernel version Kernel >= 6.11: Tests that creat() succeeds (write to executed file allowed)
Andrea Cervesato
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
Tue Apr 28 10:46:09 CEST 2026
Hi,
> From: lekshmi-cpillai <lekshmi@ktes.isst.tadn.ibm.com>
>
> ---
> testcases/kernel/syscalls/creat/creat07.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/creat/creat07.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/creat/creat07.c
> index c7b85ee69..762022301 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/creat/creat07.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/creat/creat07.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
>
> #define TEST_APP "creat07_child"
>
> +static int new_behavior;
> +
> static void verify_creat(void)
> {
> pid_t pid;
> @@ -33,16 +35,26 @@ static void verify_creat(void)
>
> TEST(creat(TEST_APP, O_WRONLY));
>
> - if (TST_RET != -1) {
> - tst_res(TFAIL, "creat() succeeded unexpectedly");
> - return;
> + if (new_behavior) {
> + /* Kernel >= 6.11: write to executed file is allowed */
> + if (TST_RET != -1) {
> + SAFE_CLOSE(TST_RET);
> + tst_res(TPASS, "creat() succeeded as expected (new behavior)");
> + } else {
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "creat() failed unexpectedly");
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* Kernel < 6.11: write to executed file returns ETXTBSY */
> + if (TST_RET != -1) {
> + tst_res(TFAIL, "creat() succeeded unexpectedly");
> + SAFE_CLOSE(TST_RET);
> + } else if (TST_ERR == ETXTBSY) {
> + tst_res(TPASS, "creat() received ETXTBSY");
> + } else {
> + tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "creat() failed unexpectedly");
> + }
> }
>
> - if (TST_ERR == ETXTBSY)
> - tst_res(TPASS, "creat() received EXTBSY");
> - else
> - tst_res(TFAIL | TTERRNO, "creat() failed unexpectedly");
> -
> SAFE_KILL(pid, SIGKILL);
> SAFE_WAITPID(pid, NULL, 0);
> }
> @@ -50,9 +62,13 @@ static void verify_creat(void)
> static void setup(void)
> {
> if ((tst_kvercmp(6, 11, 0)) >= 0) {
> - tst_brk(TCONF, "Skipping test, write to executed file is "
> - "allowed since 6.11-rc1.\n"
> - "2a010c412853 (\"fs: don't block i_writecount during exec\")");
> + new_behavior = 1;
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Testing new behavior: write to executed file is "
> + "allowed since 6.11-rc1 (2a010c412853)");
> + } else {
> + new_behavior = 0;
> + tst_res(TINFO, "Testing old behavior: write to executed file "
> + "returns ETXTBSY");
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.1
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
There's too much going on in these nested statements. The `new_behavior`
is not needed, we only need to save the error code (-1 or ETXTBSY) inside
a static variable.
If it's not -1, TST_EXP_ERR() can be used. Otherwise we print a TPASS.
The kernel version is printed before every test execution, so there's no
need to show any information about it.
Also test it with `-i` parameter. The test is likely broken with this patch.
Kind Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
More information about the ltp
mailing list