[LTP] [PATCH v2 3/3] memcg/memcontrol04: fix typos, redundant define and format specifiers

[Disha Goel]

Fix typos in doc comment ('tempfs' -> 'tmpfs', 'becaue' -> 'because'),
remove '#define TMPDIR \"mntdir\"' which duplicates the definition already
in memcontrol_common.h, replace PRIdPTR with %zu for size_t arguments
(PRIdPTR is for signed intptr_t, not unsigned size_t), fix 'dont not'
-> 'do not' in inline comment, and remove now-unused <inttypes.h>
include.

Signed-off-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.ibm.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
- Remove now-unused <inttypes.h> include (PRIdPTR was its only user)
- Split from combined memcontrol03+04 patch into separate patch per file

 testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c | 12 ++++--------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c
index 15d8f891c..22ca1df8c 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/controllers/memcg/memcontrol04.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
  * The closest thing to memory.low on V1 is soft_limit_in_bytes which
  * uses a different mechanism and has different semantics. So we only
  * test on V2 like the selftest. We do test on more file systems, but
- * not tempfs becaue it can't evict the page cache without swap. Also
+ * not tmpfs because it can't evict the page cache without swap. Also
  * we avoid filesystems which allocate extra memory for buffer heads.
  *
  * The tolerances have been increased from the self tests.
@@ -36,12 +36,8 @@
 
 #define _GNU_SOURCE
 
-#include <inttypes.h>
-
 #include "memcontrol_common.h"
 
-#define TMPDIR "mntdir"
-
 static struct tst_cg_group *trunk_cg[3];
 static struct tst_cg_group *leaf_cg[4];
 static int fd = -1;
@@ -102,7 +98,7 @@ static void alloc_anon_in_child(const struct tst_cg_group *const cg,
 
 	SAFE_CG_PRINTF(cg, "cgroup.procs", "%d", getpid());
 
-	tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating anon: %"PRIdPTR,
+	tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating anon: %zu",
 		getpid(), tst_cg_group_name(cg), size);
 	alloc_anon(size);
 
@@ -122,7 +118,7 @@ static void alloc_pagecache_in_child(const struct tst_cg_group *const cg,
 
 	SAFE_CG_PRINTF(cg, "cgroup.procs", "%d", getpid());
 
-	tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating pagecache: %"PRIdPTR,
+	tst_res(TINFO, "Child %d in %s: Allocating pagecache: %zu",
 		getpid(), tst_cg_group_name(cg), size);
 	alloc_pagecache(fd, size);
 
@@ -227,7 +223,7 @@ static void test_memcg_low(void)
 			TST_EXP_EXPR(low == 0,
 				"(%c low events=%ld) == 0", id, low);
 		} else if (!tst_cg_memory_recursiveprot(leaf_cg[F])) {
-			/* dont not check F when recursive_protection enabled */
+			/* do not check F when recursive_protection enabled */
 			TST_EXP_EXPR(low == 0,
 				"(%c low events=%ld) == 0", id, low);
 		}
-- 
2.45.1