[LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] include/old: rename legacy headers to tso_* namespace
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Mon Feb 2 00:52:56 CET 2026
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 7:26 AM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi Li, all,
>
> > > As I wrote, I don't like the whole rename but I will not block it.
> > > I guess it will be merged after the release, just not to break
> anything.
>
> > > But is it worth to rename whole old API sources and headers? Isn't it
> > > enough
> > > just to know that 'tst_' or 'tse_' are new API, the rest is the old
> API or
> > > no
> > > API? Each rename means that 'git log' requires '--' because the rename.
>
>
> > Well, yes, that's my hesitation too.
>
> > However, I believe the old APIs may persist for a long time. Therefore,
> > using consistent naming conventions for all APIs will make it easier for
> > LTP beginners to understand the code logic.
>
> OK. Ack for both commits.
> Acked-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
>
Both merged, thank you.
--
Regards,
Li Wang
More information about the ltp
mailing list