[LTP] [PATCH v16] high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c: new test for testing acpi_cppc/highest_perf
Piotr Kubaj
piotr.kubaj@intel.com
Wed Jun 10 15:30:49 CEST 2026
Verify for all online logical CPUs that their highest performance value are
the same for HWP Capability MSR 0x771 and CPPC sysfs file.
On HWP-capable x86 platforms the acpi_cppc/highest_perf sysfs attribute is
expected to reflect the same highest-performance value that firmware
programs into the HWP Capabilities MSR (0x771, bits 7:0). A mismatch
between the two interfaces indicates a kernel regression in how CPPC
values are exposed to userspace, and would break tools (e.g. cpupower,
intel_pstate tuning scripts) that rely on the sysfs interface to make
frequency-scaling decisions.
The test is valid only for Intel platforms.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Kubaj <piotr.kubaj@intel.com>
---
Previously wrong patch was sent - the older one with mismatch array.
Pointed out by the AI bot.
runtest/power_management_tests | 1 +
testcases/kernel/power_management/.gitignore | 1 +
.../power_management/high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 130 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/power_management/.gitignore
create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/power_management/high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c
diff --git a/runtest/power_management_tests b/runtest/power_management_tests
index b670da6ec..4da57ee72 100644
--- a/runtest/power_management_tests
+++ b/runtest/power_management_tests
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#POWER_MANAGEMENT
+high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc
runpwtests03 runpwtests03.sh
runpwtests04 runpwtests04.sh
runpwtests06 runpwtests06.sh
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/power_management/.gitignore b/testcases/kernel/power_management/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..03f0c83e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/power_management/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc
diff --git a/testcases/kernel/power_management/high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c b/testcases/kernel/power_management/high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..19c0fc8f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testcases/kernel/power_management/high_freq_hwp_cap_cppc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2026 Piotr Kubaj <piotr.kubaj@intel.com>
+ */
+
+/*\
+ * Verify for all online logical CPUs that their highest performance value are
+ * the same for HWP Capability MSR 0x771 and CPPC sysfs file.
+ *
+ * On HWP-capable x86 platforms the acpi_cppc/highest_perf sysfs attribute is
+ * expected to reflect the same highest-performance value that firmware
+ * programs into the HWP Capabilities MSR (0x771, bits 7:0). A mismatch
+ * between the two interfaces indicates a kernel regression in how CPPC
+ * values are exposed to userspace, and would break tools (e.g. cpupower,
+ * intel_pstate tuning scripts) that rely on the sysfs interface to make
+ * frequency-scaling decisions.
+ *
+ * The test needs root because reading /dev/cpu/N/msr needs CAP_SYS_RAWIO /
+ * root.
+ */
+
+#include "tst_test.h"
+#include "tst_safe_prw.h"
+
+#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
+#include "lapi/cpuid.h"
+
+#define MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES 0x771
+#define HIGHEST_PERF_MASK 0xFF
+
+#define CPUID_LEAF_THERMAL 0x6
+#define CPUID_HWP_BIT (1 << 7)
+
+static int nproc;
+static int fd = -1;
+
+static void setup(void)
+{
+ unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+
+ __cpuid_count(CPUID_LEAF_THERMAL, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
+ if (!(eax & CPUID_HWP_BIT))
+ tst_brk(TCONF, "HWP not supported (MSR 0x771 unavailable)");
+
+ if (access("/dev/cpu/0/msr", F_OK) == -1)
+ tst_brk(TCONF | TERRNO, "msr driver not loaded");
+
+ if (access("/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf", F_OK) == -1)
+ tst_brk(TCONF | TERRNO, "CPPC sysfs not available");
+
+ nproc = tst_ncpus_conf();
+}
+
+static void cleanup(void)
+{
+ if (fd != -1)
+ SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
+}
+
+static void run(void)
+{
+ bool status = true;
+ char path[PATH_MAX];
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < nproc; i++) {
+ int online = 1;
+ unsigned long long msr_highest_perf = 0, sysfs_highest_perf = 0;
+
+ if (i) {
+ snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/online", i);
+ SAFE_FILE_SCANF(path, "%d", &online);
+ }
+
+ if (!online) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "CPU%d offline, skipping", i);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/acpi_cppc/highest_perf", i);
+ SAFE_FILE_SCANF(path, "%llu", &sysfs_highest_perf);
+ tst_res(TDEBUG, "%s: %llu", path, sysfs_highest_perf);
+
+ snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/dev/cpu/%d/msr", i);
+ fd = SAFE_OPEN(path, O_RDONLY);
+
+ SAFE_PREAD(1, fd, &msr_highest_perf, sizeof(msr_highest_perf), MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES);
+ SAFE_CLOSE(fd);
+ msr_highest_perf &= HIGHEST_PERF_MASK;
+ tst_res(TDEBUG, "%s: %llu", path, msr_highest_perf);
+
+ bool match = msr_highest_perf == sysfs_highest_perf;
+
+ if (!match) {
+ tst_res(TINFO, "cpu%d: sysfs=%llu MSR=%llu",
+ i, sysfs_highest_perf, msr_highest_perf);
+ status = false;
+ }
+
+ tst_res(TINFO, "cpu%d: %s", i, match ? "OK" : "MISMATCH");
+ }
+
+ if (status)
+ tst_res(TPASS, "Sysfs and MSR values are equal");
+ else
+ tst_res(TFAIL, "Highest performance values differ between sysfs and MSR");
+}
+
+static struct tst_test test = {
+// .needs_cpu_vendor = "GenuineIntel",
+ .needs_kconfigs = (const char *const []) {
+ "CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB",
+ "CONFIG_X86_MSR",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .needs_root = 1,
+ .setup = setup,
+ .cleanup = cleanup,
+ .supported_archs = (const char *const []) {
+ "x86",
+ "x86_64",
+ NULL
+ },
+ .test_all = run
+};
+
+#else
+TST_TEST_TCONF("test requires x86");
+#endif
--
2.47.3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Technology Poland sp. z o.o.
ul. Slowackiego 173 | 80-298 Gdansk | Sad Rejonowy Gdansk Polnoc | VII Wydzial Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sadowego - KRS 101882 | NIP 957-07-52-316 | Kapital zakladowy 200.000 PLN.
Spolka oswiadcza, ze posiada status duzego przedsiebiorcy w rozumieniu ustawy z dnia 8 marca 2013 r. o przeciwdzialaniu nadmiernym opoznieniom w transakcjach handlowych.
Ta wiadomosc wraz z zalacznikami jest przeznaczona dla okreslonego adresata i moze zawierac informacje poufne. W razie przypadkowego otrzymania tej wiadomosci, prosimy o powiadomienie nadawcy oraz trwale jej usuniecie; jakiekolwiek przegladanie lub rozpowszechnianie jest zabronione.
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies; any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited.
More information about the ltp
mailing list