[LTP] [PATCH] clone11: skip CLONE_NEWCGROUP on kernels < 4.6

Avinesh Kumar avinesh.kumar@suse.com
Fri Jun 12 07:14:47 CEST 2026


Hi,

Reviewed-by: Avinesh Kumar <avinesh.kumar@suse.com>


On 6/11/26 4:03 PM, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> From: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
> 
> CLONE_NEWCGROUP was added in kernel v4.6. On older kernels such as
> v4.4, the flag is unknown and clone() returns EINVAL instead of the
> expected EPERM, causing a spurious test failure.
> 
> Add a per-test-case minimum kernel version check so that the
> CLONE_NEWCGROUP case reports TCONF on kernels older than 4.6.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>
> ---
>   testcases/kernel/syscalls/clone/clone11.c | 10 +++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/clone/clone11.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/clone/clone11.c
> index 028da778158de6867a71ac3974f9c2263481d3a3..607e42585fad41784be9104be01f504218559342 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/clone/clone11.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/clone/clone11.c
> @@ -21,9 +21,10 @@ static int *child_pid;
>   static struct tcase {
>   	uint64_t flags;
>   	const char *sflags;
> +	int min_kver[3];
>   } tcases[] = {
>   	{ DESC(CLONE_NEWPID) },
> -	{ DESC(CLONE_NEWCGROUP) },
> +	{ DESC(CLONE_NEWCGROUP), .min_kver = {4, 6, 0} },
>   	{ DESC(CLONE_NEWIPC) },
>   	{ DESC(CLONE_NEWNET) },
>   	{ DESC(CLONE_NEWNS) },
> @@ -40,6 +41,13 @@ static void run(unsigned int n)
>   {
>   	struct tcase *tc = &tcases[n];
>   
> +	if (tc->min_kver[0] &&
> +	    tst_kvercmp(tc->min_kver[0], tc->min_kver[1], tc->min_kver[2]) < 0) {
> +		tst_res(TCONF, "clone(%s) needs kernel %d.%d+",
> +			tc->sflags, tc->min_kver[0], tc->min_kver[1]);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	TST_EXP_FAIL(ltp_clone(tc->flags, child_fn, NULL, CHILD_STACK_SIZE, child_stack),
>   		EPERM, "clone(%s) should fail with EPERM",
>   		tc->sflags);
> 
> ---
> base-commit: a375e8deed471723f5a0114c56eb48fe6f6f45d3
> change-id: 20260611-fix_clone11_min_kver-394cf499c2c7
> 
> Best regards,

Regards,
Avinesh



More information about the ltp mailing list