[LTP] [PATCH] fanotify25: fix test failure on kernel with CONFIG_MODULES=n

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify25.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify25.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify25.c
> index c982f3225..9b03fd9ab 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify25.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fanotify/fanotify25.c
> @@ -24,10 +24,10 @@ static const struct traceconfig {
>  	const char *filename;
>  	const char *wdata;
>  } trace_cmds[] = {
> -	{EVENTS_SYSFILE, "p:ltp_load_module_0 load_module"},
> -	{MNTPOINT "/events/kprobes/ltp_load_module_0/enable", "1"},
> -	{MNTPOINT "/events/kprobes/ltp_load_module_0/enable", "0"},
> -	{EVENTS_SYSFILE, "-:ltp_load_module_0"},
> +	{EVENTS_SYSFILE, "p:ltp_load_script_0 load_script"},
> +	{MNTPOINT "/events/kprobes/ltp_load_script_0/enable", "1"},
> +	{MNTPOINT "/events/kprobes/ltp_load_script_0/enable", "0"},
> +	{EVENTS_SYSFILE, "-:ltp_load_script_0"},

Doesn't this depend on CONFIG_BINFMT_SCRIPT? How likely is that this is
turned off?

If possible I would like to avoid whack-a-mole game trying to find
something that is commonly enabled.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz