[LTP] [RFC] testcases: unify naming for syscall tests ending in digits

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> I noticed both styles are used for tests of syscalls ending in digits:
> 
> For example:
>   dup2/dup201.c
>   dup3/dup3_01.c
> 
> Would it be better to unify them as dup2_01.c / dup3_01.c for consistency?

It makes sense to unify, I'm not sure if it should be dup201.c and
dup301.c or dup2_01.c and dup3_02.c.

If we want to keep the naming consistent with the rest of LTP we should
probably go for dup201.c and dup301.c but it's a bit less readable than
the underscore variant.

Does anyone else has an opinion here?

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz