[LTP] [PATCH v11 1/2] lib: Extend tst_assert_ulong() with enum flags
Andrea Cervesato
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
Fri Sep 4 10:51:06 CEST 2026
H Wei,
I was re-checking the whole patch-set and it looks a bit overengineered
from my point of view. A few points below.
> +enum tst_assert_flags {
> + TST_ASSERT_SATURATED_INT = 1,
> + TST_ASSERT_TRUNC_32BIT = 2,
> +};
Adding new flags for the whole LTP core library trying to fix a single
test is not a good idea in general. Also, TST_ASSERT_TRUNC_32BIT is
probably not needed.
> + safe_file_scanf(file, lineno, NULL, path, "%llu", &sys_val_64);
This is the real fix. Read below.
> +
> + if (flags & TST_ASSERT_SATURATED_INT) {
> + if (sys_val_64 > (unsigned long long)INT_MAX)
> + expected_val = (unsigned long)INT_MAX;
> + else
> + expected_val = (unsigned long)sys_val_64;
> + } else if (flags & TST_ASSERT_TRUNC_32BIT) {
In 32bit compat mode `unsigned long` becomes 32bit, so we can simply do:
void tst_assert_ulong(const char *file, const int lineno, const char *path, unsigned long val)
{
unsigned long long sys_val;
safe_file_scanf(file, lineno, NULL, path, "%llu", &sys_val);
if (val == (unsigned long)sys_val) {
tst_res_(file, lineno, TPASS, "%s = %lu", path, val);
return;
}
tst_res_(file, lineno, TFAIL, "%s != %lu got %lu",
path, val, (unsigned long)sys_val);
}
And then, inside the test:
if (tst_is_compat_mode() && info.shmmax == INT_MAX)
tst_res(TPASS, "shmmax clamped to INT_MAX in compat mode");
else
TST_ASSERT_ULONG(PATH_KERN_SHMMAX, info.shmmax);
TST_ASSERT_ULONG(PATH_KERN_SHMMNI, info.shmmni);
TST_ASSERT_ULONG(PATH_KERN_SHMALL, info.shmall);
Please verify if this is working anyway. We can probably fix the
whole patch-set with a couple of lines instead of defining
redundant flags and specific code for a single test.
Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
More information about the ltp
mailing list