[LTP] Replacing runltp-ng with kirk

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> The idea, now, is to replace runltp-ng, since it's not maintained 
> anymore, and replace it with kirk in the LTP official release.

Given that runltp-ng evolved into kirk I suppose that replacing it with
kirk in LTP is what we should do, especially since nobody is going to
invest into runltp-ng anymore.

I suppose that we should:

- put kirk to some more offical place
  should it live under linux-test-project umbrela?
- replace the submodule
- add symlink from runltp-ng to kirk

Does everyone agree or should we do something different?

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz