binary packaging

Denis Francisci denis.francisci@gmail.com
Tue Dec 23 18:47:00 CET 2014


I agree. Maybe we could decide a dead line for closing the source packaging
(for ongoing packaging), then complete the rest of software in the old way
and establish a date for the final release of ArcheOS 5 that is long
overdue. I can offer my help if you need.
Bye

Denis

2014-12-23 18:06 GMT+01:00 Luca Bezzi <luca.bezzi@arc-team.com>:

> Hi,
> I was thinking, to speed up the final release of ArcheOS 5, to go on with
> binary packaging for the software that is missing. This year me and Ale had
> to work on the field untill now, but we should have more free time form now
> on and we could proceed with binary packaging, waiting to learn better
> source packaging. We could consider just 64 bit (we have no chance to test
> 32 bit packages). In this way we could release a first version with many
> source packages (the ones Romain did) and (for the rest) binary packages.
> We could optimize everything later. What do you think about it?
>
> --
> Mailing list info: http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/archeos-dev
>
-------------- parte successiva --------------
Un allegato HTML � stato rimosso...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/archeos-dev/attachments/20141223/f6fc69e3/attachment.html>


More information about the Archeos-dev mailing list