[ArcheOS] ArcheOS 5 test during Open Techne UNESCO master
Lun 14 Apr 2014 14:35:24 CEST
I have 2 questions:
Is ArcheOS 5 still 32 bit? Will it be a 64 bit version?
Do you think it will run on this board
Da: "Archeos-dev" firstname.lastname@example.org
A: "Luca Bezzi" email@example.com
Cc: "ArcheOS ML" firstname.lastname@example.org,"ArcheOS ML" email@example.com
Data: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:44:10 +0200
Oggetto: Re: ArcheOS 5 test during Open Techne UNESCO master
> Thanks Luca for this precious feedback...I'll start working to see how to fix all these...
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Luca Bezzi <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I took the occasion to test ArcheOS 5 during my lessons (2D photomapping) in the UNESCO master Open Techne. Here are some reports:
> 1) to build the iso image I had to follow the indications Fabrizio wrote in this email: http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/archeos/2014-April/000557.html
> 2) a mandatory software is missing:
> Kate (but in archeos-meta is already in the archeos-office metapackage: https://github.com/archeos/archeos-meta/blob/master/debian/control); could it be that archeos-meta is not updated when is building the iso?
> 3) some system utilities are missing (they are useful to do not scare too much new user about GNU/Linux system; I experimented it during the lessons)
> Synaptic and an archiving tool able to read zip files (Ark? or something similar)
> Could we put these software (and eventually similar applications) into a metapackage (e.g. archeos-utilities or archeos-system-utilities)?
> 4) a mandatory software is outdated: QGIS (actual version: 2.2, in ArcheOS 5 1.7). The problem is that for ArcheOS 4 we took QGIS from GFOSS repository, but that repository seems to be outdated, while QGIS has actual packages in its own repository:
> deb http://qgis.org/debian wheezy main
> deb-src http://qgis.org/debian wheezy main
> We should update the repos, so that we can use directly QGIS 2.2, which has some very important new options (soon a videotutorial about it)
> 5) Some QGIS plugin are necessary for specific archaeological workflow or to simplify some operations (e.g. CADTools, PyArchInit,
> QuickWKT, etc..). Can we manage the problem like we did for ArcheOS 4 (a specific package with all the extensions and a postcript)?
> I think it would be the best option
> 6) It was possible to install OpenJUMP 1.3 from ArcheOS 4 repos both on 32 and 64 machines. It would be very fast to do a
> new package (not a clean source but anyway an indipendent architecture package) with OpenJUMP 1.6. Can we do something like this,
> while waiting to understand the correct specifications for java source packagig?
> For the rest, regarding what I taught, ArcheOS 5 is almost ready.
> Nice greetings to everybody.
> Mailing list info: http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/archeos-dev
-------------- parte successiva --------------
Un allegato HTML è stato rimosso...
Maggiori informazioni sulla lista