[gpm] Question about commit e8ea3d3...

[Nico Schottelius]

Mike Frysinger [Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:04:59PM -0400]:
> On Sunday 20 April 2008, Nico Schottelius wrote:
> > Added become_daemon() from gpm2 to gpm1.
> >
> > This is a bit ugly, as it implies some relative symlinks, but it works
> > for the translation to gpm2.
> 
> so gpm as a maintenance branch will stay linux-only, but gpm2 will be 
> targetting POSIX ?  sounds fine to me, just want to make sure i understand 
> things :

Mostly correct, although I'll prefer patches that are posix compliant in
all trees, so I can reuse patches for 1.20.x for 1.99.x.

I know that there will be os-dependent code in gpm2, too, but this
should only be in os-specific drivers (mouse/console).

Nico


-- 
Think about Free and Open Source Software (FOSS).
http://nico.schottelius.org/documentations/foss/the-term-foss/

PGP: BFE4 C736 ABE5 406F 8F42  F7CF B8BE F92A 9885 188C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/gpm/attachments/20080421/9b7dfeb0/attachment.pgp