[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] syscalls: Add timer measurement library
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
Thu Jun 22 15:45:13 CEST 2017
Hi!
> > Hi,
> >
> > looks good to me.
Pushed with your ack.
> > It compiled fine across RHEL 5/6/7 x86_64. No failures when I run it
> > on my laptop.
> >
> > I plan to also run it across multiple arches/distros on randomly
> > picked systems from lab.
>
> Results from ~35 random RHEL6/7 systems look OK. I've hit
> one failure in RHEL6, but that looks like bug in older kernel,
> because the delays are huge:
>
> tst_test.c:870: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> tst_timer_test.c:345: INFO: CLOCK_MONOTONIC resolution 1ns
> tst_timer_test.c:357: INFO: prctl(PR_GET_TIMERSLACK) = 50us
> tst_timer_test.c:275: INFO: nanosleep() sleeping for 1000us 500 iterations, threshold 450.01us
> tst_timer_test.c:296: INFO: Found 488 outliners in [500430,12493] range
> tst_timer_test.c:318: INFO: min 1056us, max 500430us, median 500198us, trunc mean 466362.70us (discarded 25)
> tst_timer_test.c:321: FAIL: nanosleep() slept for too long
>
> Time: us | Frequency
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1056 | **+
> 27339 | -
> 53622 | -
> 79905 | .
> 106188 | -
> 132471 | .
> 158754 | .
> 185037 | -
> 211320 | .
> 237603 | -
> 263886 | .
> 290169 | -
> 316452 | .
> 342735 | -
> 369018 | -
> 395301 | .
> 421584 | -
> 447867 | -
> 474150 | ********************************************************************
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 26283us | 1 sample = 0.15044 '*', 0.30088 '+', 0.60177 '-', non-zero '.'
>
> Not reproducible when I try to run it by hand.
That indeed looks like a kernel bug, isn't there something in dmesg?
--
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz
More information about the ltp
mailing list