[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] syscalls: Add timer measurement library
Jan Stancek
jstancek@redhat.com
Thu Jun 22 15:58:20 CEST 2017
----- Original Message -----
> >
> > tst_test.c:870: INFO: Timeout per run is 0h 05m 00s
> > tst_timer_test.c:345: INFO: CLOCK_MONOTONIC resolution 1ns
> > tst_timer_test.c:357: INFO: prctl(PR_GET_TIMERSLACK) = 50us
> > tst_timer_test.c:275: INFO: nanosleep() sleeping for 1000us 500 iterations,
> > threshold 450.01us
> > tst_timer_test.c:296: INFO: Found 488 outliners in [500430,12493] range
> > tst_timer_test.c:318: INFO: min 1056us, max 500430us, median 500198us,
> > trunc mean 466362.70us (discarded 25)
> > tst_timer_test.c:321: FAIL: nanosleep() slept for too long
> >
> > Time: us | Frequency
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 1056 | **+
> > 27339 | -
> > 53622 | -
> > 79905 | .
> > 106188 | -
> > 132471 | .
> > 158754 | .
> > 185037 | -
> > 211320 | .
> > 237603 | -
> > 263886 | .
> > 290169 | -
> > 316452 | .
> > 342735 | -
> > 369018 | -
> > 395301 | .
> > 421584 | -
> > 447867 | -
> > 474150 |
> > ********************************************************************
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 26283us | 1 sample = 0.15044 '*', 0.30088 '+', 0.60177 '-', non-zero '.'
> >
> > Not reproducible when I try to run it by hand.
>
> That indeed looks like a kernel bug, isn't there something in dmesg?
No, nothing at the time nanosleep01 was running.
We carry patch below in our tests, so it's easier to link some dmesg
output with testcases.
diff --git a/pan/ltp-pan.c b/pan/ltp-pan.c
index cee71aa..79dc3fa 100644
--- a/pan/ltp-pan.c
+++ b/pan/ltp-pan.c
@@ -1360,6 +1360,12 @@ static void write_test_start(struct tag_pgrp *running)
running->cmd->cmdline, "", "exit", "<<<test_output>>>");
}
fflush(stdout);
+
+ FILE *f = fopen("/dev/kmsg", "w");
+ if (f) {
+ fprintf(f, "ltptest %s start\n", running->cmd->name);
+ fclose(f);
+ }
}
Regards,
Jan
More information about the ltp
mailing list