[LTP] [PATCH 1/1] syscalls/fanotify10: Require kernel v4.19
Tue Nov 6 14:32:33 CET 2018
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:06 PM Petr Vorel <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi Amir,
> > There must be some confusion.
> > FAN_MARK_MOUNT was NOT added in v4.19-rc2.
> > It has been there from the start.
> > FAN_MARK_INODE was NOT added either
> > the define FAN_MARK_INODE 0 is just a convenience readability define
> > it does not change the API.
> I'm sorry, you're right.
> > You may be confusing with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM
> > just was just added in kernel v4.20-rc1.
> > The extension of tests to cover FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM
> > is waiting in my queue:
> > https://github.com/amir73il/ltp/commits/fanotify_sb
> > And it already includes runtime checks for FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM
> > support.
> > Did I miss anything?
> Testing your branch on older kernel, fanotify10 fails earlier than new TCONF
Because fanotify10 checks for a bug that existed since the beginning
and fixed by 9bdda4e9cf2d fsnotify: fix ignore mask logic in fsnotify().
So test SHOULD fail until the backported patch is applied to the old kernel.
The patch does not apply cleanly to kernels <= v4.17.
Tested backport patch for v4.14.y attached.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2236 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the ltp