[LTP] [PATCH] shmctl01: don't use hardcoded index == 0 for SHM_STAT test
Jan Stancek
jstancek@redhat.com
Tue May 21 15:49:23 CEST 2019
----- Original Message -----
> Hi!
> > +static void func_sstat_setup(void)
> > +{
> > + struct shm_info tmp;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = shmctl(shm_id_1, SHM_INFO, (void *)&tmp);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + tst_resm(TFAIL|TERRNO, "shmctl(SHM_INFO)");
>
> I wonder if it makes sense to continue here if shmctl() has failed,
> maybe we should do tst_brkm(TBROK ...) instead.
It is 'setup phase', but it also is kind-of test for shmctl() as well.
We don't risk much if we continue, worst case is we get one more fail.
@Petr: Do you have any preference?
>
> Otherwise it looks good, acked.
>
> --
> Cyril Hrubis
> chrubis@suse.cz
>
More information about the ltp
mailing list