[LTP] [PATCH] shmctl01: don't use hardcoded index == 0 for SHM_STAT test

[Petr Vorel]

Hi Jan, Cyril,

> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi!
> > > +static void func_sstat_setup(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct shm_info tmp;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = shmctl(shm_id_1, SHM_INFO, (void *)&tmp);
> > > +	if (ret < 0)
> > > +		tst_resm(TFAIL|TERRNO, "shmctl(SHM_INFO)");

> > I wonder if it makes sense to continue here if shmctl() has failed,
> > maybe we should do tst_brkm(TBROK ...) instead.

> It is 'setup phase', but it also is kind-of test for shmctl() as well.
> We don't risk much if we continue, worst case is we get one more fail.

> @Petr: Do you have any preference?
Cyril's point makes sense, but I prefer Jan's way.


Kind regards,
Petr