[LTP] Purpose of clock_nanosleep2 tests ?

[Viresh Kumar]

On 21-04-20, 11:20, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
> > While working on the time64 variants I stumbled upon
> > testcases/kernel/syscalls/clock_nanosleep2/.
> > 
> > The commit  log says that we were trying to test clock_nanosleep2()
> > syscall, which I am unable to find, but still this ends up calling the kernel
> > variant directly for clock_nanosleep() only.
> > 
> > What am I missing ? Why is this stuff required ?
> 
> Hmm, I guess that there is no clock_nanosleep2() and the test is a
> result of a confusion of some kind. Maybe the author just confused
> clock_nanosleep(2) with clock_nanosleep2().
> 
> Looking at clock_nanosleep() tests, there does not seem to be a test
> for ABSTIME so the best solution would be to move the test to
> clock_nanosleep directory. What do you think?

clock_nanosleep03.c already tests ABSTIME. I think we can just drop
clock_nanosleep2 directory completely. I will send a patch if that looks okay.

-- 
viresh