[LTP] [PATCH 1/4] syscalls/sync01: Remove it

[Xiao Yang]

On 11/7/20 12:47 AM, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> I have a doubt after reading Xu's patch[1] and Martin's patch[2]:
>>
>> 1) Xu removed sync01 because sync() always return 0.
> Actually sync() is defined as void function, so the tests were bogusly
> checking the TST_RET value which haven't been set at all.

Hi Cyril,

Oops, I gave a wrong example. :-(

On error, I just wonder if we need to check all return value(i.e. 
negative value except -1).

IOW, Is it possible for syscall to get a error value which is not -1?

Best Regards,

Xiao Yang

>