[LTP] LTP release

[Cixi Geng]

Hi Cyril:
Can we merge the uart device driver testcase and the device-discover framework ？
So that we can continue write other device driver case in LTP.
I am looking forward contribute to ltp on the driver test .

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/list/?series=185240
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/ltp/list/?series=195151

Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> 于2020年9月10日周四 下午5:23写道：
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 3:19 PM Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 9:26 PM Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi!
>>> > Also I would like to get rid of the -fno-optimize-sibling-calls in the
>>> > Makefile, this makes the test a bit fragile and less portable.
>>
>>
>> I'm not very sure, let me think/check a while.
>
>
> From the document, it could also help prevents optimization purposes.
> I think we can have a try, if no more issues, that will be great.
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> /*
>>>  * Returns negative number if stack grows down, possitive if stack grows up
>>>  */
>>> static int stack_dir(void)
>>> {
>>>         intptr_t addr = addr_func();
>>>
>>>         printf("%p %p\n", &addr, (void*)addr);
>>
>>
>> This method may be doable, but the second %p print (nil), I don't why.
>
>
> The reason seems that the local variable is revoked after the function
> is calling, so we get NULL of the local variable address. It works as we
> expected when introducing a global pointer to save and return the '&a'.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Li Wang
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp