[LTP] [PATCH 1/1] aio-stress.c: Use static variable iterations
Richard Palethorpe
rpalethorpe@suse.de
Mon Dec 12 17:31:03 CET 2022
Hello,
Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> writes:
> local iteration variable in worker() was probably left over from
> previous versions rewrite (maybe -i was not used in previous versions).
>
> Clang correctly reported:
> aio-stress.c:1049:6: warning: variable 'iteration' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> int iteration = 0;
>
> Fixes: 054d45390 ("Rewrite aio-stress test using LTP API")
>
> Reported-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> ---
> Hi,
>
> reported by Richie [1], I got confused thus merge before this fix.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/87h6yfifbr.fsf@suse.de/
>
> testcases/kernel/io/ltp-aiodio/aio-stress.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/io/ltp-aiodio/aio-stress.c b/testcases/kernel/io/ltp-aiodio/aio-stress.c
> index 39db14d65..29e679087 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/io/ltp-aiodio/aio-stress.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/io/ltp-aiodio/aio-stress.c
> @@ -1046,7 +1046,6 @@ static int *worker(struct thread_info *t)
> char *this_stage = NULL;
> struct timeval stage_time;
> int status = 0;
> - int iteration = 0;
> int cnt;
>
> aio_setup(&t->io_ctx, 512);
> @@ -1151,7 +1150,7 @@ restart:
>
> /* someone got restarted, go back to the beginning */
> if (t->active_opers && cnt < iterations) {
> - iteration++;
> + iterations++;
Why is this correct?
> goto restart;
> }
--
Thank you,
Richard.
More information about the ltp
mailing list