[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/statx01: Add exit condition when parsing /proc/self/mountinfo
Richard Palethorpe
rpalethorpe@suse.de
Thu Dec 15 10:58:18 CET 2022
Hello,
"xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> writes:
> Hi Richard
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> writes:
>>
>>> When using user filesystem such as overlayfs, the current parsing way can't
>>> work well.
>>>
>>> 63 66 8:3 / /sysroot rw,relatime - ext4 /dev/sda3 rw,seclabel
>>> 43 66 8:3 /ostree/deploy/rhivos/var /var rw,relatime shared:3 - ext4 /dev/sda3 rw,seclabel
>>>
>>> So add the exit condition for statx.mnt_id check so it can skip the
>>> underflying filesystem and parse the correct user fileystem's mnt_id.
>>>
>>> Fixes: #1001
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> v1-v2: change the fail message
>>> testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c | 7 ++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>>> index 60b50958b..e9677475a 100644
>>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>>> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static void test_mnt_id(struct statx *buf)
>>> if (sscanf(line, "%"SCNu64" %*d %d:%d", &mnt_id, &line_mjr, &line_mnr) != 3)
>>> continue;
>>>
>>> - if (line_mjr == buf->stx_dev_major && line_mnr == buf->stx_dev_minor)
>>> + if (line_mjr == buf->stx_dev_major && line_mnr == buf->stx_dev_minor &&
>>> + mnt_id == buf->stx_mnt_id)
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -80,8 +81,8 @@ static void test_mnt_id(struct statx *buf)
>>> mnt_id);
>>> else
>>> tst_res(TFAIL,
>>> - "statx.stx_mnt_id(%"PRIu64") is different from mount_id(%"PRIu64") in /proc/self/mountinfo",
>>> - (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id, mnt_id);
>>> + "statx.stx_mnt_id(%"PRIu64") doesn't exist in /proc/self/mountinfo",
>>> + (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id);
>>
>> The mnt_id may exist in mountinfo, but not the triple (mnt_id,
>> dev_major, dev_minor). So really we should print all three here (unless
>> we already display that somewhere else).
>>
>
> Yes, so how about the following changes:
>
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
> index 60b50958b..8f3b01b32 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static void test_mnt_id(struct statx *buf)
> {
> FILE *file;
> char line[PATH_MAX];
> - int pid;
> + int pid, flag = 0;
> unsigned int line_mjr, line_mnr;
> uint64_t mnt_id;
>
> @@ -68,20 +68,26 @@ static void test_mnt_id(struct statx *buf)
> if (sscanf(line, "%"SCNu64" %*d %d:%d", &mnt_id,
> &line_mjr, &line_mnr) != 3)
> continue;
>
> - if (line_mjr == buf->stx_dev_major && line_mnr ==
> buf->stx_dev_minor)
> - break;
> + if (line_mjr == buf->stx_dev_major && line_mnr ==
> buf->stx_dev_minor) {
> + if (buf->stx_mnt_id == mnt_id) {
> + flag = 1;
> + break
> + }
> + tst_res(TINFO, "%s doesn't contain (%"PRIu64")
> %d:%d",
> + line, (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id,
> buf->stx_dev_major, buf->stx_dev_minor);
> + }
> }
>
> SAFE_FCLOSE(file);
>
> - if (buf->stx_mnt_id == mnt_id)
> + if (flag)
> tst_res(TPASS,
> "statx.stx_mnt_id equals to mount_id(%"PRIu64")
> in /proc/self/mountinfo",
> mnt_id);
> else
> tst_res(TFAIL,
> - "statx.stx_mnt_id(%"PRIu64") is different from
> mount_id(%"PRIu64") in /proc/self/mountinfo",
> - (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id, mnt_id);
> + "statx.stx_mnt_id(%"PRIu64") doesn't exist in
> /proc/self/mountinfo",
> + (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id);
Looks good, (except for the line wrap). With that
Reviewed-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
>
> pid = getpid();
> snprintf(line, PATH_MAX, "/proc/%d/fdinfo/%d", pid, file_fd);
>
> Best Regards
> Yang Xu
>>>
>>> pid = getpid();
>>> snprintf(line, PATH_MAX, "/proc/%d/fdinfo/%d", pid, file_fd);
>>> --
>>> 2.27.0
>>
>>
--
Thank you,
Richard.
More information about the ltp
mailing list