[LTP] [PATCH v2] syscalls/statx01: Add exit condition when parsing /proc/self/mountinfo
xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com
Fri Dec 16 03:05:12 CET 2022
Hi Richard
> Hello,
>
> "xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com" <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Richard
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> When using user filesystem such as overlayfs, the current parsing way can't
>>>> work well.
>>>>
>>>> 63 66 8:3 / /sysroot rw,relatime - ext4 /dev/sda3 rw,seclabel
>>>> 43 66 8:3 /ostree/deploy/rhivos/var /var rw,relatime shared:3 - ext4 /dev/sda3 rw,seclabel
>>>>
>>>> So add the exit condition for statx.mnt_id check so it can skip the
>>>> underflying filesystem and parse the correct user fileystem's mnt_id.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: #1001
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@fujitsu.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v1-v2: change the fail message
>>>> testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c | 7 ++++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>>>> index 60b50958b..e9677475a 100644
>>>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>>>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>>>> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static void test_mnt_id(struct statx *buf)
>>>> if (sscanf(line, "%"SCNu64" %*d %d:%d", &mnt_id, &line_mjr, &line_mnr) != 3)
>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>> - if (line_mjr == buf->stx_dev_major && line_mnr == buf->stx_dev_minor)
>>>> + if (line_mjr == buf->stx_dev_major && line_mnr == buf->stx_dev_minor &&
>>>> + mnt_id == buf->stx_mnt_id)
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -80,8 +81,8 @@ static void test_mnt_id(struct statx *buf)
>>>> mnt_id);
>>>> else
>>>> tst_res(TFAIL,
>>>> - "statx.stx_mnt_id(%"PRIu64") is different from mount_id(%"PRIu64") in /proc/self/mountinfo",
>>>> - (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id, mnt_id);
>>>> + "statx.stx_mnt_id(%"PRIu64") doesn't exist in /proc/self/mountinfo",
>>>> + (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id);
>>>
>>> The mnt_id may exist in mountinfo, but not the triple (mnt_id,
>>> dev_major, dev_minor). So really we should print all three here (unless
>>> we already display that somewhere else).
>>>
>>
>> Yes, so how about the following changes:
>>
>> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>> index 60b50958b..8f3b01b32 100644
>> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/statx/statx01.c
>> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static void test_mnt_id(struct statx *buf)
>> {
>> FILE *file;
>> char line[PATH_MAX];
>> - int pid;
>> + int pid, flag = 0;
>> unsigned int line_mjr, line_mnr;
>> uint64_t mnt_id;
>>
>> @@ -68,20 +68,26 @@ static void test_mnt_id(struct statx *buf)
>> if (sscanf(line, "%"SCNu64" %*d %d:%d", &mnt_id,
>> &line_mjr, &line_mnr) != 3)
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (line_mjr == buf->stx_dev_major && line_mnr ==
>> buf->stx_dev_minor)
>> - break;
>> + if (line_mjr == buf->stx_dev_major && line_mnr ==
>> buf->stx_dev_minor) {
>> + if (buf->stx_mnt_id == mnt_id) {
>> + flag = 1;
>> + break
>> + }
>> + tst_res(TINFO, "%s doesn't contain (%"PRIu64")
>> %d:%d",
>> + line, (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id,
>> buf->stx_dev_major, buf->stx_dev_minor);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> SAFE_FCLOSE(file);
>>
>> - if (buf->stx_mnt_id == mnt_id)
>> + if (flag)
>> tst_res(TPASS,
>> "statx.stx_mnt_id equals to mount_id(%"PRIu64")
>> in /proc/self/mountinfo",
>> mnt_id);
>> else
>> tst_res(TFAIL,
>> - "statx.stx_mnt_id(%"PRIu64") is different from
>> mount_id(%"PRIu64") in /proc/self/mountinfo",
>> - (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id, mnt_id);
>> + "statx.stx_mnt_id(%"PRIu64") doesn't exist in
>> /proc/self/mountinfo",
>> + (uint64_t)buf->stx_mnt_id);
>
> Looks good, (except for the line wrap). With that
>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
Yes, I remove the line wrap and merged, thanks for your review.
Best Regards
Yang Xu
>
>>
>> pid = getpid();
>> snprintf(line, PATH_MAX, "/proc/%d/fdinfo/%d", pid, file_fd);
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Yang Xu
>>>>
>>>> pid = getpid();
>>>> snprintf(line, PATH_MAX, "/proc/%d/fdinfo/%d", pid, file_fd);
>>>> --
>>>> 2.27.0
>>>
>>>
>
>
More information about the ltp
mailing list