[LTP] [PATCH v2 5/5] memcontrol03: Copy from kselftest

[Li Wang]

> > Also I think I asked if this si really needed in v1, don't we enable the
> > required subgroups in group_mk() anyways?
>
> No, we only automatically add the controllers to subtree_control in the
> test's group. Note that this is not the same as enabling the
> controller. The controller becomes active as soon as it is added to the
> root node's subtree control. Adding it to subtree_control means that the
> direct children get their own allotments in addition to sharing the
> parent's. I assume that for some tests we don't want that, we want the
> children to fully compete over the parent's resources.
>
> Also subtree_control can effect whether a group is a threaded
> domain... We could perhaps add a variant of `tst_cgroup_group_mk` which
> enables subtrees by default. I just don't want it to be hidden that we
> are enabling it.
>
>
+1 I think that is wise. We explicitly reserve the usage of CGroup V2 for
users.
In case of bringing confusion for people who are not familiar with LTP API.

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20220208/e545fdaa/attachment.htm>