[LTP] [REGRESSION] lkft ltp for 6763a36

Joerg Vehlow lkml@jv-coder.de
Tue Jun 21 09:15:01 CEST 2022


Hi,

Am 6/17/2022 um 3:17 AM schrieb lkft@linaro.org:
> ## Build
> * kernel: 5.17.15
> * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
> * git branch: linux-5.17.y
> * git commit: eed68052d2016d9f96d6656435099762608120e3
> * git describe: 6763a36
> * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/ltp/build/6763a36
> 
> ## Test Regressions (compared to 20220527-48-g47ebb84)
> * qemu_arm, ltp-syscalls-tests
>   - accept02
> 
> 
> ## Metric Regressions (compared to 20220527-48-g47ebb84)
> No metric regressions found.
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> 
> 
> ## Test Fixes (compared to 20220527-48-g47ebb84)
> * qemu_arm, ltp-syscalls-tests
>   - inotify12
> 
> * qemu_arm64, ltp-crypto-tests
>   - af_alg07
@Martin
This test is very unstable, can we do anything about it?

> 
> * qemu_arm64, ltp-syscalls-tests
>   - inotify12
> 
> * qemu_i386, ltp-fs-tests
>   - read_all_proc
I've seen this test fail a lot, has anyone ever tried to analyze it? I
was unable to reproduce the problem when running the test in isolation.


> 
> * qemu_i386, ltp-syscalls-tests
>   - inotify12
> 
> * qemu_x86_64, ltp-syscalls-tests
>   - inotify12
> 

Joerg


More information about the ltp mailing list