[LTP] [REGRESSION] lkft ltp for 6763a36
Joerg Vehlow
lkml@jv-coder.de
Tue Jun 21 09:15:01 CEST 2022
Hi,
Am 6/17/2022 um 3:17 AM schrieb lkft@linaro.org:
> ## Build
> * kernel: 5.17.15
> * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
> * git branch: linux-5.17.y
> * git commit: eed68052d2016d9f96d6656435099762608120e3
> * git describe: 6763a36
> * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/ltp/build/6763a36
>
> ## Test Regressions (compared to 20220527-48-g47ebb84)
> * qemu_arm, ltp-syscalls-tests
> - accept02
>
>
> ## Metric Regressions (compared to 20220527-48-g47ebb84)
> No metric regressions found.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
>
>
> ## Test Fixes (compared to 20220527-48-g47ebb84)
> * qemu_arm, ltp-syscalls-tests
> - inotify12
>
> * qemu_arm64, ltp-crypto-tests
> - af_alg07
@Martin
This test is very unstable, can we do anything about it?
>
> * qemu_arm64, ltp-syscalls-tests
> - inotify12
>
> * qemu_i386, ltp-fs-tests
> - read_all_proc
I've seen this test fail a lot, has anyone ever tried to analyze it? I
was unable to reproduce the problem when running the test in isolation.
>
> * qemu_i386, ltp-syscalls-tests
> - inotify12
>
> * qemu_x86_64, ltp-syscalls-tests
> - inotify12
>
Joerg
More information about the ltp
mailing list