[LTP] [REGRESSION] lkft ltp for 6763a36

[Jan Stancek]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:15 AM Joerg Vehlow <lkml@jv-coder.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 6/17/2022 um 3:17 AM schrieb lkft@linaro.org:
> > ## Build
> > * kernel: 5.17.15
> > * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
> > * git branch: linux-5.17.y
> > * git commit: eed68052d2016d9f96d6656435099762608120e3
> > * git describe: 6763a36
> > * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/ltp/build/6763a36
> >
> > ## Test Regressions (compared to 20220527-48-g47ebb84)
> > * qemu_arm, ltp-syscalls-tests
> >   - accept02
> >
> >
> > ## Metric Regressions (compared to 20220527-48-g47ebb84)
> > No metric regressions found.
> >
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> >
> >
> > ## Test Fixes (compared to 20220527-48-g47ebb84)
> > * qemu_arm, ltp-syscalls-tests
> >   - inotify12
> >
> > * qemu_arm64, ltp-crypto-tests
> >   - af_alg07
> @Martin
> This test is very unstable, can we do anything about it?
>
> >
> > * qemu_arm64, ltp-syscalls-tests
> >   - inotify12
> >
> > * qemu_i386, ltp-fs-tests
> >   - read_all_proc
> I've seen this test fail a lot, has anyone ever tried to analyze it? I
> was unable to reproduce the problem when running the test in isolation.

I see it hit timeouts too (read_all_sys as well). I think it needs
runtime restored to 5minutes as well, atm. it has 30s.

>
>
> >
> > * qemu_i386, ltp-syscalls-tests
> >   - inotify12
> >
> > * qemu_x86_64, ltp-syscalls-tests
> >   - inotify12
> >
>
> Joerg
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
>