[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] ptrace07: Fix compilation by avoiding aligned_alloc

[Pengfei Xu]

Hi Richard,

On 2022-10-18 at 16:25:27 +0100, Richard Palethorpe wrote:
> Use memalign instead because we live in the past.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
> Cc: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> index 6bd2b1062..a60c2a49e 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
>  #include "config.h"
>  #include "ptrace.h"
>  #include "tst_test.h"
> +#include "tst_safe_macros.h"
>  #include "lapi/cpuid.h"
>  
>  #ifndef PTRACE_GETREGSET
> @@ -95,7 +96,7 @@ static void do_test(void)
>  	 * of the XSAVE/XRSTOR save area) required by enabled features in XCR0.
>  	 */
>  	__cpuid_count(CPUID_LEAF_XSTATE, ecx, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> -	xstate = aligned_alloc(64, ebx);
> +	xstate = SAFE_MEMALIGN(64, ebx);
>  	struct iovec iov = { .iov_base = xstate, .iov_len = ebx };
>  	int status;
>  	bool okay;

Yes, it's better for LTP compilation. Thanks for the patch!

I checked SAFE_MEMALIGN(), it will verify that the buffer is NULL or not.
"
	rval = memalign(alignment, size);

	if (rval == NULL) {
		tst_brkm_(file, lineno, TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup_fn,
			"memalign() failed");
	}
"
So could you remove below unnecessary lines in ptrace07.c, thanks.
"
-	if (!xstate)
-		tst_brk(TBROK, "aligned_alloc() failed for xstate buffer");
"

Thanks!
BR.

> -- 
> 2.36.1
>