[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] ptrace07: Fix compilation by avoiding aligned_alloc
Li Wang
liwang@redhat.com
Wed Oct 19 04:59:54 CEST 2022
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 9:40 AM Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 2022-10-18 at 16:25:27 +0100, Richard Palethorpe wrote:
> > Use memalign instead because we live in the past.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
> > Cc: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> > index 6bd2b1062..a60c2a49e 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> > #include "config.h"
> > #include "ptrace.h"
> > #include "tst_test.h"
> > +#include "tst_safe_macros.h"
> > #include "lapi/cpuid.h"
> >
> > #ifndef PTRACE_GETREGSET
> > @@ -95,7 +96,7 @@ static void do_test(void)
> > * of the XSAVE/XRSTOR save area) required by enabled features in
> XCR0.
> > */
> > __cpuid_count(CPUID_LEAF_XSTATE, ecx, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> > - xstate = aligned_alloc(64, ebx);
> > + xstate = SAFE_MEMALIGN(64, ebx);
> > struct iovec iov = { .iov_base = xstate, .iov_len = ebx };
> > int status;
> > bool okay;
>
> Yes, it's better for LTP compilation. Thanks for the patch!
>
> I checked SAFE_MEMALIGN(), it will verify that the buffer is NULL or not.
> "
> rval = memalign(alignment, size);
>
> if (rval == NULL) {
> tst_brkm_(file, lineno, TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup_fn,
> "memalign() failed");
> }
> "
> So could you remove below unnecessary lines in ptrace07.c, thanks.
>
I helped modify this and pushed it, thanks!
--
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20221019/00bb7e03/attachment.htm>
More information about the ltp
mailing list