[LTP] [PATCH 2/2] ptrace07: Fix compilation by avoiding aligned_alloc

Li Wang liwang@redhat.com
Wed Oct 19 04:59:54 CEST 2022


On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 9:40 AM Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Richard,
>
> On 2022-10-18 at 16:25:27 +0100, Richard Palethorpe wrote:
> > Use memalign instead because we live in the past.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
> > Cc: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> > index 6bd2b1062..a60c2a49e 100644
> > --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> > +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/ptrace/ptrace07.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> >  #include "config.h"
> >  #include "ptrace.h"
> >  #include "tst_test.h"
> > +#include "tst_safe_macros.h"
> >  #include "lapi/cpuid.h"
> >
> >  #ifndef PTRACE_GETREGSET
> > @@ -95,7 +96,7 @@ static void do_test(void)
> >        * of the XSAVE/XRSTOR save area) required by enabled features in
> XCR0.
> >        */
> >       __cpuid_count(CPUID_LEAF_XSTATE, ecx, eax, ebx, ecx, edx);
> > -     xstate = aligned_alloc(64, ebx);
> > +     xstate = SAFE_MEMALIGN(64, ebx);
> >       struct iovec iov = { .iov_base = xstate, .iov_len = ebx };
> >       int status;
> >       bool okay;
>
> Yes, it's better for LTP compilation. Thanks for the patch!
>
> I checked SAFE_MEMALIGN(), it will verify that the buffer is NULL or not.
> "
>         rval = memalign(alignment, size);
>
>         if (rval == NULL) {
>                 tst_brkm_(file, lineno, TBROK | TERRNO, cleanup_fn,
>                         "memalign() failed");
>         }
> "
> So could you remove below unnecessary lines in ptrace07.c, thanks.
>

I helped modify this and pushed it, thanks!

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/attachments/20221019/00bb7e03/attachment.htm>


More information about the ltp mailing list