[LTP] [PATCH] tcindex01: Pass if the tcindex module is blacklisted

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> > diff --git a/testcases/cve/tcindex01.c b/testcases/cve/tcindex01.c
> > index 70e5639f1..07239f9c0 100644
> > --- a/testcases/cve/tcindex01.c
> > +++ b/testcases/cve/tcindex01.c
> > @@ -106,8 +106,19 @@ static void run(void)
> >  	NETDEV_ADD_QDISC(DEVNAME, AF_UNSPEC, TC_H_ROOT, qd_handle, "htb",
> >  		qd_config);
> >  	NETDEV_ADD_TRAFFIC_CLASS(DEVNAME, qd_handle, clsid, "htb", cls_config);
> > -	NETDEV_ADD_TRAFFIC_FILTER(DEVNAME, qd_handle, 10, ETH_P_IP, 1,
> > -		"tcindex", f_config);
> > +	ret = tst_netdev_add_traffic_filter(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0, DEVNAME,

I do not like that much that we add the __FILE__ and __LINE__ into the
test by hand. Maybe just add another macro
NETDEV_ADD_TRAFIC_FILTER_RET() so that we don't have to write these into
the testcases?

> nit: we now don't use NETDEV_ADD_TRAFFIC_FILTER() macro any more. I guess it can
> stay because you sooner or later will use it.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
> 
> > +		qd_handle, 10, ETH_P_IP, 1, "tcindex", f_config);
> > +	TST_ERR = tst_netlink_errno;
> Out of curriosity, I suppose you save tst_netlink_errno to TST_ERR because it
> would be overwritten later in other LTP netlink API functions.

Because he wants to print it with TTERRNO later.

> > +
> > +	if (!ret && TST_ERR == ENOENT) {
> > +		tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO,
> > +			"tcindex module is blacklisted or unavailable");
> > +		return;
> > +	}

I guess that our .needs_drivers does not take blacklists into account,
otherwise we could have just added tcindex into .needs_drivers.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz