[LTP] [PATCH] tcindex01: Pass if the tcindex module is blacklisted

[Petr Vorel]

> Hi!
> > > diff --git a/testcases/cve/tcindex01.c b/testcases/cve/tcindex01.c
> > > index 70e5639f1..07239f9c0 100644
> > > --- a/testcases/cve/tcindex01.c
> > > +++ b/testcases/cve/tcindex01.c
> > > @@ -106,8 +106,19 @@ static void run(void)
> > >  	NETDEV_ADD_QDISC(DEVNAME, AF_UNSPEC, TC_H_ROOT, qd_handle, "htb",
> > >  		qd_config);
> > >  	NETDEV_ADD_TRAFFIC_CLASS(DEVNAME, qd_handle, clsid, "htb", cls_config);
> > > -	NETDEV_ADD_TRAFFIC_FILTER(DEVNAME, qd_handle, 10, ETH_P_IP, 1,
> > > -		"tcindex", f_config);
> > > +	ret = tst_netdev_add_traffic_filter(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0, DEVNAME,

> I do not like that much that we add the __FILE__ and __LINE__ into the
> test by hand. Maybe just add another macro
> NETDEV_ADD_TRAFIC_FILTER_RET() so that we don't have to write these into
> the testcases?

> > nit: we now don't use NETDEV_ADD_TRAFFIC_FILTER() macro any more. I guess it can
> > stay because you sooner or later will use it.

> > Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>

> > > +		qd_handle, 10, ETH_P_IP, 1, "tcindex", f_config);
> > > +	TST_ERR = tst_netlink_errno;
> > Out of curriosity, I suppose you save tst_netlink_errno to TST_ERR because it
> > would be overwritten later in other LTP netlink API functions.

> Because he wants to print it with TTERRNO later.

> > > +
> > > +	if (!ret && TST_ERR == ENOENT) {
> > > +		tst_res(TPASS | TTERRNO,
> > > +			"tcindex module is blacklisted or unavailable");
> > > +		return;
> > > +	}

> I guess that our .needs_drivers does not take blacklists into account,
> otherwise we could have just added tcindex into .needs_drivers.

That reminds me .modprobe_module WIP patchset. I was not able to continue with
it, also I'm still gathering what is needed, I was not sure if it's needed to
add it or it'd be possible to enhance .needs_drivers. Also, I'd be great to
collect these few tests with non-standard requirements into a single ticket.

Kind regards,
Petr