[LTP] [REGRESSION] pidns05 timeout (was: [PATCH 1/2] lib: multiply the timeout if detect slow kconfigs)

[Cyril Hrubis]

Hi!
> Yes, I understand your concern. I agree that we can avoid the
> kconfig detection for most faster test cases.
> 
> After reviewing my previous pre-release LTP test and compare to
> the current main branch test, it doesn't show much more time-consuming,
> maybe there is different HW/kernel factors, but the performance
> impact can be ignored.

I've just send a patch that caches the detection results, because in the
case of pins05 we did parse the config for each SAFE_CLONE() call.

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz