[LTP] [REGRESSION] pidns05 timeout (was: [PATCH 1/2] lib: multiply the timeout if detect slow kconfigs)

[Petr Vorel]

> Hi!
> > Yes, I understand your concern. I agree that we can avoid the
> > kconfig detection for most faster test cases.

> > After reviewing my previous pre-release LTP test and compare to
> > the current main branch test, it doesn't show much more time-consuming,
> > maybe there is different HW/kernel factors, but the performance
> > impact can be ignored.

> I've just send a patch that caches the detection results, because in the
> case of pins05 we did parse the config for each SAFE_CLONE() call.

Thanks! Elegant solution, I should have come up with static myself instead of
complaining :).

Kind regards,
Petr