[LTP] [PATCH] read: verify read size and data correctness

Jinseok Kim always.starving0@gmail.com
Thu Apr 16 15:23:58 CEST 2026


Hi,

Thanks for the review.

While looking into this further, I realized that strengthening read01.c
in this way would make it overlap with read04.c.
Would you prefer me to:

- keep read01.c as a minimal success test, or
- update read01.c and drop read04.c as redundant?

The main distinction seems to be full read vs short read at EOF,
so I wanted to confirm your preference before sending the
next revision.

Thanks,
Jinseok.


More information about the ltp mailing list