[LTP] [PATCH] read: verify read size and data correctness

[Andrea Cervesato]

Hi Jinseok,

> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> While looking into this further, I realized that strengthening read01.c
> in this way would make it overlap with read04.c.
> Would you prefer me to:
> 
> - keep read01.c as a minimal success test, or
> - update read01.c and drop read04.c as redundant?
> 
> The main distinction seems to be full read vs short read at EOF,
> so I wanted to confirm your preference before sending the
> next revision.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jinseok.

I'm sorry, indeed I didn't notice that this test was overlapping
I would keep the test minimal then, because we don't want to have
two tests haveing the same purpose.

Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com