[LTP] lapi: fallback SPLICE_F_MORE

[linuxtestproject.agent@gmail.com]

Hi Andrea,

--- [PATCH 1/3] ---

On 2026-05-08, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> lapi: fallback SPLICE_F_MORE

The commit body is empty. Please add at least one sentence explaining
why this fallback is needed — e.g. which kernel version introduced
SPLICE_F_MORE, or that it is required by the xfrm01 test added later
in this series.

--- [PATCH 2/3] ---

On 2026-05-08, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> lapi: fallback UDP_ENCAP and UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP

Same issue: the commit body is empty. Add a sentence describing why
these constants need a fallback definition.

---
Note:

Our agent completed the review of the patch. The agent can sometimes
produce false positives although often its findings are genuine. If
you find issues with the review, please comment this email or ignore
the suggestions.

Regards,
LTP AI Reviewer