[LTP] lapi: fallback SPLICE_F_MORE

Andrea Cervesato andrea.cervesato@suse.com
Fri May 8 11:28:44 CEST 2026


Hi,

> Hi Andrea,
> 
> --- [PATCH 1/3] ---
> 
> On 2026-05-08, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> > lapi: fallback SPLICE_F_MORE
> 
> The commit body is empty. Please add at least one sentence explaining
> why this fallback is needed — e.g. which kernel version introduced
> SPLICE_F_MORE, or that it is required by the xfrm01 test added later
> in this series.
> 
> --- [PATCH 2/3] ---
> 
> On 2026-05-08, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> > lapi: fallback UDP_ENCAP and UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP
> 
> Same issue: the commit body is empty. Add a sentence describing why
> these constants need a fallback definition.

These two can be safely ignored.

Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com


More information about the ltp mailing list