[LTP] lapi: fallback SPLICE_F_MORE
Andrea Cervesato
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
Fri May 8 11:28:44 CEST 2026
Hi,
> Hi Andrea,
>
> --- [PATCH 1/3] ---
>
> On 2026-05-08, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> > lapi: fallback SPLICE_F_MORE
>
> The commit body is empty. Please add at least one sentence explaining
> why this fallback is needed — e.g. which kernel version introduced
> SPLICE_F_MORE, or that it is required by the xfrm01 test added later
> in this series.
>
> --- [PATCH 2/3] ---
>
> On 2026-05-08, Andrea Cervesato wrote:
> > lapi: fallback UDP_ENCAP and UDP_ENCAP_ESPINUDP
>
> Same issue: the commit body is empty. Add a sentence describing why
> these constants need a fallback definition.
These two can be safely ignored.
Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
More information about the ltp
mailing list